Previous Entry | Next Entry

An EGC development model

  • Jan. 14th, 2006 at 2:24 PM
ash snow
Based on a recent post by [info]stevensteven, I was inspired to develop my own model for local EGC development. It is important to consider that the levels I present are not discrete. Rather, they represent a spectrum of capabilities and degrees of quality. For example, a local body might be at level 2 in performance, but still at level 1 in materials. At the same time, these areas are not unconnected, and most likely will grow together. Moreover, each area needs to be attended to for all to grow: level 3 in community will probably not be able to be reached if a local body has level 1 materials. The years that I give for each level are admittedly just educated guesses, although I believe they are reasonably accurate.

Naturally, this is all just a suggestion. Please feel free to ignore or mangle this model to fit your vision.


LEVEL ONE (0-2 years)

Performance: Officers are partially or totally on script. Music capability is minimal, such as tapes or CDs on a small stereo system. Lighting capability is minimal, provided by either candles or standard room lighting. Performance skills such as voice-control and physicality are at beginner levels. Ritual skill is perhaps minimal (e.g. just learning to "vibrate"). Blocking of the ritual is rough.

Materials: A basic set of items is available, mostly owned by individuals. Some items and furniture are ad hoc (e.g. using everyday furniture, like a cabinet with a sheet over it for an altar, a bedsheet for the Veil, etc.). Space is use of people's homes.

Community: Consists of a small, core group. At this size, cohesion is not too difficult to establish and maintain, since communication and events are relatively easy to coordinate. Mass is performed ad hoc (i.e. not on a regular schedule) and most or all celebrations are Private. There is probably limited clergy, if any.

Priority: Ritual competence and learning about the Mass, both in terms of performance and theory.

Other actions: Start acquiring and constructing materials. Begin a savings account for future property, and begin considering goals for it. Consider ways to reach out to the larger community to find like-minded individuals.

LEVEL TWO (3-6 years)

Performance: All officers off-script (except perhaps the Collects for the Deacon). Music capability has increased, with live musicians and/or an excellent sound system with a music selection designed specifically for the ritual. Skill in performance and ritual increased. Things like blocking and timing are becoming smoother. Lighting capability has increased, perhaps with ability to create coloring and spot effects.

Materials: All the basic material requirements are fulfilled, and are partially owned by the local body. Items and furniture are no longer ad hoc and are made specifically for Mass use, although some might still be rough (e.g. High Altar not to spec). All officers have proper vestments. There are ritual items for the People, including missals and adequate seating. The space is partially or fully dedicated to the Mass, although it might still be attached to private ownership, and might be less than ideal regarding comfort and functionality for O.T.O. rituals.

Community: Has grown beyond a small group of people. Cohesion is no longer very tight, since cliques are starting to form. Performance of the Mass becomes more regular, and Public celebrations are the majority. Local body begins to make more effort to bring in new congregants, mostly by word-of-mouth, but with other methods being tried out. Other ecclesiastical rituals are beginning to take place regularly, especially Baptism and Confirmation. Non-ritual events are also starting to occur, including scheduled social events, workshops, and training for new officers. Most likely some members have become ordained clergy.

Priorities: Continue working on ritual proficiency, expanding out to other EGC rituals. Complete the inventory of required materials. Set concrete financial goals for a future temple space and develop objectives to meet them. Find ways to support the development and health of the local community. Acquire at least semi-dedicated space.

Other actions: Start making ritual components such as music and lighting more sophisticated. Begin training program for potential officers. Expand outreach. Offer classes and workshops.

LEVEL THREE (7-15 years)

Performance: All core officers are highly competent and knowledgeable, with excellent vocal, physical, and ritual skills. Music capability is sophisticated, with skilled musicians and/or a high-quality sound system with perhaps original scoring, all working in perfect accord with the ritual. Lighting can be manipulated to a high degree, perhaps even dynamically during the ritual. Blocking and timing of all ritual events have become seamless and elegant.

Materials: All materials are owned by the local body, and are of high quality and made to proper specifications. Vestments are attractive and well made. There is now a store of items, with multiple styles of props and vestments that allows for variation. Furniture is functional and well-crafted. The space is fully dedicated and maintained by the local body. Moreover, the space is reasonably attractive, comfortable, and designed for O.T.O. ritual use.

Community: Group has grown to become a large, vibrant community. At this size, the local leadership puts forth effort to maintain social cohesion and high moral, such as coordinating multiple social events. Public Masses are offered on a regular schedule, at minimum once a week. A more sophisticated effort is made to advertise the Mass to people who might find it valuable. The local body has a sophisticated set of texts and educational materials for newcomers and experienced members alike. Clergy begins to get involved in the larger spiritual community, if this is both realistic and useful. A complete range of ecclesiastical "services" are regularly offered, including all the official and unofficial EGC rites, as well as original liturgical rituals and pastoral counseling. A sophisticated officer-training program is offered by the local Episcopate. Several members are now ordained clergy, including one or more Bishops.

Priorities: Acquiring a fully dedicated long-term space. Monitoring the spiritual and social needs of the local community and fulfilling them as possible. Expanding the inventory of materials to include high-quality items. Promote expertise development amongst clergy (e.g. pastoral counseling).

Other actions: Continue on path to temple ownership. Expand presence into larger community in sensible ways. Encourage new officers from the local community in consideration for replacing outgoing clergy.

~

Tags:

Comments

[info]al_qhadhulu wrote:
Jan. 14th, 2006 11:27 pm (UTC)
I really enjoy these posts of yours. :-)
[info]ash93 wrote:
Jan. 15th, 2006 01:30 am (UTC)
Thanks. :)
[info]tailerouge wrote:
Jan. 15th, 2006 12:50 am (UTC)
What do you mean by physical skills?
[info]exnomine wrote:
Jan. 15th, 2006 01:25 am (UTC)
How much ya' bench? :)
[info]ash93 wrote:
Jan. 15th, 2006 01:29 am (UTC)
Gesturing
Comfort with the weapons
Walking, strutting, marching, dancing, etc,
Posture

Essentially gaining greater control in how one uses the body within the ritual.
[info]christeos_pir wrote:
Jan. 15th, 2006 01:45 am (UTC)
> Walking, strutting, marching, dancing, etc,

Great, now I'm seeing Mick Jagger in a priest's robe and headgear, going:

GOT TA GET TA GOT TA GET TA MMMMMMMMMMMM BAY-BAYEEEEEEEEE...
[info]ash93 wrote:
Jan. 15th, 2006 02:56 am (UTC)
I'd go that Mass.
[info]tailerouge wrote:
Jan. 16th, 2006 01:12 am (UTC)
That makes sense. You're talking about the theater aspect of ritual, or rather one aspect of the theater aspect of ritual. Hmm. Gives me an idea for a newsletter article.
[info]anubis75 wrote:
Jan. 15th, 2006 09:02 am (UTC)
Well written. I like how you mapped the EGC growth. It was watching a local body grow from the Sanctuary's point of view. Being our Central Ritual, that's a good point of view to have.
[info]dayglow_pirate wrote:
Jan. 15th, 2006 04:59 pm (UTC)
An excellent post! I'm adding you so I don't miss any of these great ideas, of yours, for LB's.
[info]ash93 wrote:
Jan. 15th, 2006 07:23 pm (UTC)
Welcome to my gravity well. I've returned the compliment...
[info]voronx wrote:
Jan. 17th, 2006 08:31 pm (UTC)
It's great to find people who share the Vision.
adding you.
[info]ash93 wrote:
Jan. 17th, 2006 10:06 pm (UTC)
rightbackatcha
[info]tzaddi_93 wrote:
Feb. 1st, 2006 10:06 am (UTC)
This all sounds wonderful, but I would think having the local body dictate the music to be used (the originally scored music you suggest) would hamper the performance of some mass teams while enhancing others.

As a priestess, I would not appreciate having to use music for my circumambulation that was not of my choosing.

I also think that different mass teams or individual ritualists will always be at different levels of performance (and I don't mean just newbies vs. veterans.) There are some people who are fabulous theatrically but not as good magickally. There are some people who are wonderful magicians who can raise a ton of energy but don't necessarily deliver the speeches in a way that is most effective for the congregation.

I think the best reflection on the level of the local body is what resources they provide to help individual ritualists progress. What kind of classes are taught in ritual performance, individual mass role performance, and mass symbolism? How well do these classes meet the needs of the local novitiate? How frequently are guest mass teams from other geographical areas invited to perform at the local body? (Seeing a fresh interpretation of how to perform the ritual generally can lead to growth as a ritualist.) If there aren't formal classes, how are beginning novices trained in the local body? What other kind of support is provided to new/developing mass teams? And (this is generally a touchy subject), how is it handled when an experienced ritualist regularly gives a sub-par performance?
[info]ash93 wrote:
Feb. 1st, 2006 06:12 pm (UTC)
You are reading a bit too much into my model. This model is concerned strictly with capability/quality. So, for example, a highly advanced sanctuary would theoretically be able to provide a priestess with any music she wanted, either live or via a sound system, which would be expertly played and sound amazing. The key here is not what is played, but how it is played. So, imagine a visiting priestess coming to this fictional sanctuary saying, "damn, I forgot my CD of this really obscure music I like to use..." and the music coodinator saying, "oh, we have that in our vast music library, let's go get it...and did you know they had these other rare releases?..."

And of course there will be clergy working at different levels of capability. This is a good thing, because it assumes that new officers are entering into the Mass. And I certainly agree that a mature sanctuary would offer many classes and paths to leadership within the EGC. I do take exception to the idea that it's okay to have some capability in one area and not in another. It's all important, and every aspect has an impact on the celebration. Yes, some things are more "key" than others, but this is the nature of competence building for any complex activity: the foundational skills are learned first, and over time more and more subtlety and skill is brought into it. This is how the novice goes to intermediate then goes to expert then goes to master. Too many individuals and communities in OTO accept the intermediate stage as the end goal, when it should ideally be mastery.

The problem is a sense of complacency. This attitude keeps both individuals and groups from excelling. The notion of "good enough" should be anathema to us...rather, we should always be asking, "how can we do this even better?"